shift+control

76design's blog

The Candy Bowl Theory or Tragedy of the Commons or Glucose Rage

Posted by mindorff on September 11th, 2009

A couple weeks ago I was randomly inspired to do something kind for my fellow colleagues. Not having any actual hypothesis in mind, I referred to it as a “social experiment”, hoping it would yield some sort of result or impact – and that it did.

I filled a small white bowl from our kitchen with jujubes and placed it at the end of my desk. I felt good about it. As people started coming into my office, they would notice the candy, be pleasantly surprised and indulge.  Making them happy, made me even happier and gave me incentive to continue to fill up my bowl (at this point, the bowl was being emptied after about 5 – 6 hours).
shutterstock_26625250

People were showing up in my office for no apparent reason, making up all kinds of excuses to be there, all the while, feeding like vultures from the bowl.  In true Pavlovian fashion, the mere sound of a bag opening or treats filling up the bowl, would create a response from the team (at this point the bowl was being emptied after about 2 – 3 hours).

The happier people were, the more excited I was to go out of my way to get more rubbery-textured confectioneries into that bowl the next day. Every day I would fill the bowl with something different – jujubes, pistachios, Clodhoppers, chocolate covered almonds, swedish berries, M&M’s (by the time the M&M’s hit the bowl, it took 20 minutes to empty).

Then, somewhere between the chocolate covered almonds and swedish berries, something started to happen. People started verbalizing preferences and complaining. Several “facts” about free candy and nuts began to emerge; apparently pistachios are “too much work” and chocolate covered almonds are “boring”. The more complaints I received, the less incentive I felt to fill up that stupid little white bowl.

As I stopped filling it up, the expectation for the candy became apparent. People were actually getting upset that there wasn’t anything in the bowl.

“Oh, the bowl is empty again?”
“Where the f&*% is the candy??”
“I’m not very happy about this empty candy bowl situation.”

In hopes of cutting down on the comments, I ended up taking the bowl out of my office altogether.

So, my theory is this – the candy bowl is just like life:

Unexpected pleasantries = satisfaction
Expected pleasantries = dissatisfaction

So the next time life hands you a gummie bear, just eat the friggin’ thing and be happy!

13 Responses to “The Candy Bowl Theory or Tragedy of the Commons or Glucose Rage”

  1. rob

    I like chocolate almonds.

  2. Ryan

    “So the next time life hands you a gummie bear, just eat the friggin’ thing and be happy!”

    Agreed. You could also replace “gummie bear” with any friday treat as well.

  3. steve

    I’m heading to your office right now and expecting gummie bears! :P

  4. kirsty

    I like chocolate almonds too.

  5. SSP

    What about gummie bears?

  6. Scott

    My mouth still hurts from the staples…

    WHY DID YOU PUT STAPLES.

  7. Keelan Green

    You better fill the f**k-ing candy blow.

  8. Rick

    Nice. You should try a similar experiment with a communal bowl with which office mates take turns filling with treats. We do it in my office area and it seems to work well. :)

  9. Ana

    Ha! so true.

  10. Leisha

    I can confirm this theory as a frequent consumer… And I think I heard KG SCREAMING out my name yesterday because he thought I ate all the gummy bears. Candy drives people wild. Great theory Laura, let’s see how far we can take this…

  11. Jason Dojc

    Dan Ariely, writer of “Predictably Irrational” would love to hear this story. Rationally, one shouldn’t really complain about free food; however, there are some fundamental quirks in human nature. We fall in love with what we already have; and we focus on what we might lose, rather than what we might gain.

    Once the food in the bowl became a routine occurrence, it ceased to be seen as “free” and became seen as “an entitlement” and people felt free to be picky and make demands.

  12. shawn hall

    I am kind of curious about Keelan’s comment.

  13. Eric

    Well written Laura. :-) Made for a funny read.